Re: New XSL working draft published
Oops, I just realized that you were refering to the lack of a DTD in the XML version of the XSL specification document, not the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO. Anyway, it seems like they just don't like DTDs in general. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Rick Geimer wrote: > > Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > > PPS I am slightly surprised to find no DTD referred to in the XML > > file. It renders XSLT processing interesting, as I had naively assumed > > I could use the id() function, and of course I can't.... > > > > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? > > Rick Geimer > National Semiconductor > rick.geimer@xxxxxxx > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format