RE: MSXML Whitespace handling

>  I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your
>  customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations.

Completelly agree!
"compliance with their expectations" looks like the key expression for me.

No complains about MSXML architecture.

I just believe that the default value for the
"DOMDocument.preserveWhiteSpace"
property should be TRUE instead of FALSE.


Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Pawson, David
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:30
> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: MSXML Whitespace handling
>
> I think this  provides the focus Andrew. Nearer to 98% of users
> of MSXML will not appreciate the finer points of document load options,
> simply using a tool that MS provides.
> We are repeatedly told that space is preserved within xsl:text elements.
> We use it like that and expect certain outcomes.
>  I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your
>  customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations.
>
> Regards DaveP
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list