RE: more on XSLT processor performance
> I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner. > However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones. > 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical - Compiling won't solve the memory problem. If we're going to make XSLT processing of such large files practical, the only way we'll do it is by using persistent storage rather than memory for the tree. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format