Matthew Bentley writes:
 > >For my type of work, in my computer setup, Saxon wins pretty
 > >easily. Others will have different criteria to choose from what is
 > >really a very rich field of contenders.
 > 
 > I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner.
 > However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones.
 > 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical -

what does that have to do with compiled?  seriously. when the Java one
gets into memory, do you really see a huge difference in the kind of
work an XSLT processor does? ie string processing and walking tree
structures in memory.

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list