[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: feature request

Subject: Re: feature request
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:57:29 +0100 (BST)
Re: feature request
 In XML 1.0, entities are the most flexible
 and widely supported way to manage external relationships, so that's
 what I use. 

I have to say that looking around my local disk for multiple file
documents I'd have to acknowledge that they all use external parsed
entities and none of them use xlink (or xinclude), and many of them use
MathML which has over a thousand internal `character entities' as well,
However I would still argue that conceptually entities are by design
distinct from the document structure, they allow an author to split up
the file as he or she pleases, without having any effect on the logical
document. So if you use entities you are supposed to _expect_ that an
application expands them and you are not supposed to care. (I do care,
but you are supposed to do as I say, not as I do:-)

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.