[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: feature request

Subject: Re: feature request
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:19:41 +1000
Re: feature request
At 09:19 16/05/2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

Eric van der Vlist writes:
 > The other form (using entities) seems to have defenders amongst the
 > SGMLers.
 > Reading between the lines, do you mean it could be becoming deprecated
 > and that a way to go could be using XLink and XPointer ?

I dont think you need read very far between the lines to find that
there is a considerable band of people who would ban entities tomorrow
if they could, in favour of Xlink etc.


So this is the way of the future for XSLT?

If you can't support something in a way that
works (entities), attempt to
convince people that they shouldn't even want
them in the first place ... ?


------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.