RE: XSL-List admin query

In Microsoft Outlook 2000 I use the following rules:

  Move messages sent to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to folder xsl-list.
  Move messages sent to xsl-list-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to folder xsl-list.

I also have a rule which brings messages containing keywords such as
Microsoft and MSXML to my attention.  This has been quite effective for me.

- Jonathan Marsh
  Microsoft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarkH@xxxxxxxx [mailto:MarkH@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 3:14 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: XSL-List admin query
> 
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From:	XSL-List Owner [SMTP:xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 	Sent:	Friday, April 07, 2000 4:43 PM
> 
> 	At 7 Apr 2000 09:26 +0100, MarkH@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> 	 > i have a problem setting rules to detect and file 
> these messages
> away from
> 	 > my inbox. most messages have a trailer " XSL-List info and
> archive:
> 	 > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list" which i 
> can match on,
> but some
> 	 > don't.
> 	[bulk deleted - extracts below]
> 
> 	Regards,
> 
> 
> 	Tony Graham
> --
> 
> Hi Tony
> 
> > All XSL-List messages have the same footer.
> If only this were true I'd have no problem. Most do have the standard
> footer, but some don't. See below for an example from the 
> archive which you
> can check yourself.
> 
> > Match on the "sender" field
> Microsoft Outlook (yes some people have to use Microsoft 
> software!) does not
> allow matching on "sender" (or "reply to" etc.). Only 
> From/To/Subject/Body
> sections. Matching on "To" is no good because people use aliases (and
> Outlook doesn't see beyond these to the address). I tried 
> matching on the
> footer, but as I said, some messages don't have the standard footer.
> 
> Its an irritation rather than a big deal so if nothing can be 
> done i'll shut
> up about it!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mark
> --
> Example email which lacks the standard footer (taken from the 
> archive):
> 
> XSL-List Archive
> last() function
> From: "Richard Bell" <RichardBell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:06:52 +0100
> Organization: Rogge Global Partners PLC
> 
> Using SAXON I statements like
>  
> <xsl:if test="position()=last()"/>
>  
> seem to work OK. However, when I parse using MSXML3 I get an error
>  
> 'Last() function must have a node-set to operate on.
> position()=-->last<--()'
>  
> Any thoughts. Thanks.
> Rich.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> ----
> 
> Follow-Ups: 
> [rest of sample email deleted]
> 
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list