[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT vs Omnimark

Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:20:59 +1100
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
At 05:41 7/03/2000, Didier PH Martin wrote:

Didier replies:
Exactly. If you can implement an XSLT engine that is very fast, can handle a
lot of transaction per second on the server side, which is compliant to the
latest recommendations and which also allows the usage of JavaScript
(EcmaScript) function to produce a) text result, b) node list. You clearly
have a winner - and me as your first custommer.

Yes, but how do you get around the fundamental requirement for a lot of RAM?

I don't see how we can ever expect to parse a 150meg
document using XSLT ...

But for all the small, everyday documents, I absolutely
agree with you.

J


------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.