RE: XSLT vs Omnimark

Play the video

Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:19:13 +1100

At 05:22 7/03/2000, Jonathan Asbell wrote:

I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl.  Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards.  Please advise
(the silent mediator)


So whose "standards" should we be following?
Should there only be a single XML conversion tool/language?

Long live Omnimark, Perl, Python, ... !
The more tools the better.

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, (continued)
- Jonathan Asbell - Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:22:10 -0500
  - Didier PH Martin - Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:41:45 -0500
    - James Robertson - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:20:59 +1100
    - Rick Geimer - Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:03:48 -0800
  - James Robertson - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:19:13 +1100 <=
- Steven Mielnicki - Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:49:50 -0500 (EST)
- Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:40:36 +0100
- Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:50:40 +0100
  - Louis-Dominique Dubeau - 07 Mar 2000 07:30:25 -0500

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT vs Omnimark, Rick Geimer	Thread	XSLT vs OmniMark, Steven Mielnicki
RE: matching a substring of an elem, Mike Brown	Date	RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >