RE: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ?
And damn the language lawyers, SAXON's <assign> element would be real nice too. -r > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 2:26 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ? > > > Tony Graham writes: > > The other side of the question is how do you decide what goes into > > "Common XSL" and how often does it change. I'm sure that most users > > welcome the idea of common extensions that will increase > > interoperability of their stylesheets and let them use more of other > > people's, but who decides what's "common"? > > We could start with the list of desirables at the end of the XSLT > spec; the items cited (grouping, writing to separate output > documents) are already there. Just agreeing on names for some of > those would be nice. > > Sebastian > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format