Hi. Yes I would rather see 100 XTL languages rather than see XSL sullied. You see sir, this is an XSL mailing list. Not XQL, XTL, XLL or any other flavour of language. I am here because I am interested in XSL and it's future, not XTL. I don't care if there is never a sungle XTL language brought into exsitence. Here, on this list, all I care about is XSL. If you want to discuss the future of XTL, please go form an XTL mailing list. I have said why I'm here. Why are you here? People, wake-up, the forum is being hijacked. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/07/99 12:42:53 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Venting > > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:46:08 +0000 > From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Venting > > Some vendors may want an XTL, a generic transformation language, without > formatting. If so *go make one*, please don't hijack XSL as a style > language. It would be better in your mind to have 20 proprietary XTL's, just so XSL isn't sullied? [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format