You say your not looking to hijack the process, and then start talking about XSL being based on XTL. How did it suddenly turn that way around? Listen to what you're saying. You're talking abou the XSL process becomming an XTL process, with XSL bolted on. It will effect be adervsly as the focus and intent of the language will change. Please go look at XQL and hijack that. Cheers Guy xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/05/99 09:31:06 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: Venting [SNIP] There is nothing to worry about because you will have XSL that does everything you want. Why should you care if XSL just happens to be based on XTL? What should you care if XTL has some additional features that you don't need? What I don't understand is why you would oppose something that will benefit great number of people without affecting you negatively? We are not trying to hijack the XSL process. All we are asking is that we share the ride since we are going the same way. Best, Don Park Docuverse XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format