Re: CSS + behavior vs. XSL (was: EcmaScript, gone?)

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> Daniel Glazman wrote:

> > We have implementable solutions
> > *now* on a very low-cost base and I wonder why we should invest 4 years
> > of standardization for quite the same result...
> 
> As you and I both said: you can probably already do almost everything that
> you will be able to do in three years, but today you use gobs of scripting
> code and the DOM and in three years you will use more simple, robust,
> declarative languages like XSL. 

Actually, at the moment Daniel uses a simple and declarative language
called STTS which is I think his point (ie you are both arguing for a
declarative approach) but I will let Daniel describe further.

--
Chris



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list