[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: CSS + behavior vs. XSL (was: EcmaScript, gone?)

Subject: Re: CSS + behavior vs. XSL (was: EcmaScript, gone?)
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 09:02:40 -0500
french onomatopoeia
Daniel Glazman wrote:
> 
> Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> > W3C members have nothing to do with this "long term strategy."
> 
> Glargggl (french onomatopoeia expressing shock and breathlessness...)

I'm not sure what the point of taking this sentence out of context is. As
I said, W3C members cannot derail the process because it is the *natural
evolution of **all** information systems*. If the W3C does not follow the
path, they will be ignored as their "client organizations" (users,
businesses, etc.) find their own ways to reduce the adhoc-ery in their
systems and ignore the W3C reccommendations. The W3C only directs the
future of the Web as long as it continues to improve the web.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Everything I touch turns into Python.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.