• From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:54:55 +0000

Playing devil's advocate here ...

Invisible XML is all about converting a non-XML data format to XML. There are two problems with that:

1. There already exists a standard technology, with Apache open source tooling, to do that. It's called Data Format Description Language (DFDL). As best as I can tell, DFDL is 100 times more powerful than Invisible XML. Plus, DFDL builds on top of existing XML technologies -- XML Schema and XPath. Why reinvent the wheel, a weaker wheel at that?

2. From my cursory skimming of the Invisible XML specification, it appears that a user has to create a parser for the non-XML data format. If I have to spend the time to create a parser for a data format, I probably will also spend a bit more time writing code to process the parsed data directly. No need to introduce an additional step to convert to XML. 

/Roger

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Invisible XML 1.0 spec has been published
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@b...>
  • Re: Invisible XML 1.0 spec has been published
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>