- From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
- To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 20:59:24 +0000
There are many aspects of XML that require knowledge of its context. For example, earlier in the week my “XML quiz” noted that & does not always mean & (in the context of a CDATA section or a comment it means & but otherwise it
means &)
So things are context-dependent.
Another way of saying it is: Things are context-sensitive. XML is context-sensitive.
Koan: If XML isn’t context-free, why are we always writing context-free grammars for it? (And don't say, "Because it's useful to do so;" that begs the question:
Why is it useful?)
Scroll down to see the answer …………..
Even though XML isn’t context-free as such, it is
locally context-free, in the sense that the set of permissible expressions within a small region in a particular XML document can be described by a context-free grammar.
Adapted from the article “The Concept of Grammar Adaptability” by John N. Shutt (https://web.cs.wpi.edu/~jshutt/adapt/concept.html)
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|