• From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:51:44 +0100

On 20/07/2021 14:06, Arjun Ray wrote:
[...]
> The schema folks drove everything off the rails by introducing the
> notion of "data typing" for attributes. 

Again, from the publishing point of view this is largely irrelevant. The
only real candidate would have been a date format for date= attributes,
and its principal use would be to enforce the yyyy-mm-dd format on those
doing data entry.

Peter

(Actually, if you rename the date attribute to YYYY-MM-DD your error
rate at data entry time will fall to near zero :-)

• References:
  • The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Marcus Reichardt <u123724@g...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Arjun Ray <arayq2@g...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Arjun Ray <arayq2@g...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: The Goals of XML at 25, and the one thing that XML now needs
    • From: Arjun Ray <arayq2@g...>