[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle@g...>
  • To: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:04:45 +0100



On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 20:55, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...> wrote:
> you didn't highlight it but -1 is a double so math:pow($x,-1) is quite a tricky function, math:pow($x(xs:int(-1)) with an integer power is much simpler to define.

In case the IEEE 754-2008 Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic implements pown() with division when the exponent is a negative integer, then they actually transform expression (2) to expression (1), therefore it seems meaningful just to use expression (1).

Dimitre



Ah thanks for the correction.

David


 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member