- From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
- To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:32:37 +0000
The unofficial compact syntax for XSD <http://dret.net/projects/xscs> is even simpler:
element altitude { (xs:string)
required attribute units {"feet", "meters"}
}
I like it!
Are there validating engines which validate XML instances against schemas that are specified using this compact syntax?
Are people using this compact syntax in real-world applications?
/Roger
From: John Cowan [mailto:johnwcowan@g...]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 9:24 AM
To: Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...>
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Use DTDs!
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
<!ELEMENT altitude (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST altitude
units (feet|meters) #REQUIRED>
The unofficial compact syntax for XSD <http://dret.net/projects/xscs> is even simpler:
element altitude { (xs:string)
required attribute units {"feet", "meters"}
XSD has plenty of problems, but it shouldn't be blamed for the verboseness of XML as a language notation.
--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
