[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
  • To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@m...>
  • Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:02:03 -0400


On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@m...> wrote:
I'll bite.  I think it's that you can get away with invalid values of
ID-declared attributes if you stick with a conservative
well-formed-enforcement only parser.  The doc. is saying it's on
balance a bad idea to take advantage of this.

In part, I presume, because many XML parsers actually fall into the
useful category acknowledged by the spec, i.e. not validating, but do
read the doctype, in which case they _must_ mark the types of
attributes.  This leads to a borderline contradictory situation with,
for example, as simple a case as <a id="3b"/>.

+1


--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member