[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:14 AM, David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle@g...> wrote: On 8 October 2015 at 13:06, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote: Seems Roger has maybe turned the corner from being data oriented to being purely document oriented. If you're reading XML as a human and want to follow the id to idref then yeah, you may end up jumping around. That aside, I think id / idref is probably one of the main features of XML that distinguishes it from things like JSON. The fact that one can normalize out common references with some degree of integrity and error checking is a very good thing for data management and possibly for compact transmission sizes. If I'm interviewing supposed XML experts and they can't explain what id / idref do and why you might want them I'm instantly going to class them as non-experts...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



