Re: Why isn't the semicolon a reserved character?

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:19:21 -0400

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w...> wrote:

Last time I checked MicroXML did not have attribute value normalization
and was therefore not a strict subset of XML. But maybe that's excessive
pedantry on my part.

True that some MicroXML documents don't have the same infoset as they would considered as XML documents. But it is nevertheless true that every MicroXML document is an XML document syntactically.

--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures

References:
- Why isn't the semicolon a reserved character?
  - From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
- Re: Why isn't the semicolon a reserved character?
  - From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
- Re: Why isn't the semicolon a reserved character?
  - From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >