- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
- To: "'John Cowan'" <johnwcowan@g...>, "'Amelia A Lewis'" <amyzing@t...>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:51:34 -0500
“a specialized XML processor”
A lexical choice or…?
len
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan
[mailto:johnwcowan@g...]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:15
PM
To: Amelia A Lewis
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: RFC for XML
Object Parsing
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
wrote:
You do realize that this means "this is not
XML"?
Sure it is. It's an additional convention that a
specialized XML processor (and serializer) can take advantage of if it
understands it.
If I understand the oid attribute correctly, the
receiver may maintain a mapping from oids to element nodes in its internal
representation, and what the sender must guarantee is that if the oid
is the same, the other attributes, their values, and the content of the element
are the same as before. At least, that is the way that ETags work.
Is that correct?
--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|