[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • To: cbullard@h...
  • Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:48:37 -0500

On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:59 -0600, cbullard@h... wrote:
> [...]

> d, there are lines not worth crossing.  XI:INCLUDE is  
> one.  If DOCTYPEs aren't a problem and the modules are consistent,  
> entities work just fine, cheaply and for less programming.

This of course depends on your environment. E.g. some commonly-used XML
processors (including libxml) support XInclude out-of-the-box.

[...]

> IOW, we often are hired to use the tools at hand and we have to be  
> sharp enough to do that.

It's a trade-off - sometimes introducing new tools is a better answer
and soemtimes it isn't.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member