Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> That qualifies as a neat reversal of polarity. Not at all. I, and others never claimed that the primary use case for XML schema is for validation. Perhaps you just assumed that along with a few other things. Take the time to listen and consider, you might just find out something that will help your Basilage talk go all the better. Fraser. On 09/04/2013, Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...> wrote: > On 4/9/13 3:21 PM, John Cowan wrote: >> When you publish a set of documents, publishing the schema to which you >> claim they conform is very useful for everyone. For one thing, it's >> concrete, testable documentation about what to expect from you. This is >> the opposite of the "normal" use of schemas as input validation: here >> they are serving as *output* validation as well as documentation. > > That qualifies as a neat reversal of polarity. > > Just don't cross the streams! > > (And how long is the schema good for? A given set of documents? More?) > > Thanks, > -- > Simon St.Laurent > http://simonstl.com/ > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
