• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: ihe.onwuka@g...
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:56:01 +0100

> I have never said  writing // anything. Maybe you are presuming thats
> what is meant by a resilient test.

That what my inference from all the talk about using a context instead
of a full path... if I'm wrong please provide a simple concrete
example.


> So if the xquery you are referring to is your own homebrew... then my
> advice stands as is. Again Uche's post identifies the correct nuance.

What was the nuance - it was that subtle I missed it.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>

• References:
  • Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>