Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>> If programmers later want to inflict programming expectations of inheritance >> and reuse on the communications thus created, they will do it, but that >> madness should not be privileged as the canonical explanation. I'd argue >> that those schemas should even stay private, as details specific to a >> particular brittle implementation than as a symbol of broad agreement. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Simon St.Laurent >> http://simonstl.com/ That is essentially the argument of WS-Interoperation. Broad agreements with formal statements of general approach, inheritance and extension to define variation within kind, WS-I to define specific implementation that conforms. tc _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
