[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: MicroXML and &
- From: Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: David Carlisle <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:00:32 -0600
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:52 PM, David Carlisle <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I thought the imposed constraint of xml compatibility meant this wasn't an option?
On 01/06/2012 21:12, Pete Cordell wrote:
One possible solution is to pass through unknown entity refs
unchanged... no need to actually resolve it at parse time.
I really like this idea. Then the entities can be application specific,
although obviously the use of a common set is encouraged.
as John wrote earlier in the thread (about a different aspect)
I couldn't even support such an idea in principle. For me, one of the cornerstones of XML's value is in completely determining the lexical space. I think leaving entity interpretation to applications would kick a huge hole in that.
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
| [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please