Re: MicroXML and &
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 20:27 +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: > Uche's post about MicroXML reminded me... > > Did we ever discuss the option of allowing & not followed by #, amp;, lt;, > gt;, quot; or apos; to be considered simply as an & so you could do AT&T? > This would make manually writing MicroXML a lot easier! The first SGML document I ever worked on was about R&D at AT&T and it took me ages to work out why it didn't parse :-) I don't think banning é would fly - it's part of MathML and HTML. It's possible that having the HTML + ISO + MathML entity sets hardwired into Web browsers and explicitly allowing programs to handle undeclared entities in such a way would get somewhere. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format