[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type

• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
• To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
• Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:49:32 -0400

On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 08:10 -0500, Len Bullard wrote:
> Let's be fair.  Hytime became Elliot's by award and rightfully given the
> work he put into it, but it was being worked some years before Eliot.

Yes. Eliot was, in a way, to HyTime as Yuri was to SGML.

Layered and loosely-coupled systems win out every time over complex
monolithic ones. Of course, one must not confuse complex systems with
large specifications - the spec might be larger because it is clearer
and more precise, and not only because of new features.

Best,

Liam


-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>

• References:
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>