RE: Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
Breaking or non-breaking? Weirdly enough, the paper printing thing works but without the shredders, turtles lose their jobs. If you ever work in a SCIF, you'll appreciate why they wear masks and carry ninja weapons. True story: I made the mistake of suggesting to Erik Naggum that LISP wasn't the best way to get work done. He replied by stuffing my email inbox with a few thousand pages of LISP documentation. My IT guy was not amused. Bulk is bulky. len -----Original Message----- From: David Lee [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 8:40 AM To: Len Bullard; David Carlisle; Costello, Roger L. Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes > Let's just use LISP. Then we can reclaim our Dark Overlord Priesthood I suggest using Whitespace for both the serialization format and all XML toolchains. Then we'd literally be wearing the Kings New Clothes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) You really can't get much simpler than that. And think of the security ! printed out on paper the bad guys could never read our code OR our data ! no need for shredders, obscufication , encryption ... so many things would be solved. ---------------------------------------- David A. Lee email@example.com http://www.xmlsh.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format