Re: EXI: was : RE: what's missing in XML?What's comi
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 18:42 -0500, David Lee wrote: > Many people have tried different approaches to compressed (or 'efficient' ) > XML and I think they may have achieved their goals, in isolation. Having a > universally adopted spec & implementation I don't see as a bad thing unless > it doesn't accomplish its goals. The main goal from my perspective was to reduce the proliferation. It's too soon to know if it succeeded there, but there's some suggestion it has, at least a little. We previously were seeing things like XML-specific compression specs that didn't support mixed content, for example. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format