• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
• To: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:07:47 +0100

Original Message From: "John Cowan"
>
>> I couldn't see how to make a solution backwards compatible with existing
>> XML namespaces without it actually being XML namespaces, and so I
>> opportunistically concluded that backwards compatibility was out of scope
>> :-)
>
> Well, MicroXML uses namespace syntax (except for QNames in element names,
> which are not allowed), but puts the information in the application layer.
> MicroLark provides namespace functions as a convenience, but does not
> hide xmlns and xmlns:* attributes.


My concern with doing this is that it looks like XML namespaces but isn't, 
and that will just add to the confusion rather than reduce it.  It's not 
really shortening a description of XML namespaces, but adding an extra 
section along the lines of "...unless it's a namespace used in MicroXML, in 
which case ignore what I just told you and handle at the application level 
like this..."

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A proposal for application level XML 'namespaces'
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • A proposal for application level XML 'namespaces'
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: A proposal for application level XML 'namespaces'
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>