• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: "Johannes.Lichtenberger" <Johannes.Lichtenberger@u...>
• Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:56:31 -0400

Johannes.Lichtenberger scripsit:

> I just wandered what was the reason for the authors of the XPath
> recommendations to not include the XPath axis 'child-or-self::' as a
> counterpart to 'descendant-or-self::' in XPath 1.0, 2.0 or at all?

Another point is that an axis has to have unambiguous ordering (okay,
there's the namespace axis, but who cares about that?)  It is not
clear where the self should go on a child-or-self axis: first, last,
in the middle?

-- 
Winter:  MIT,                                   John Cowan
Keio, INRIA,                                    cowan@c...
Issue lots of Drafts.                           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand!
Might simplicity return?                        (A "tanka", or extended haiku)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: missing XPath axis
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • missing XPath axis
    • From: "Johannes.Lichtenberger" <Johannes.Lichtenberger@u...>