[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: giving xml a colonic: re-opening (or re-opining on) an old

• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
• Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:01:47 -0400

I still like the old Qname URI.  The IETF draft expired, but here's a blog 
post: 
        http://www.pacificspirit.com/2004/12/17/qname_urn_namespace

Worth dusting this off and trying to move it forward?
        /r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/

• References:
  • giving xml a colonic: re-opening (or re-opining on) an old argument
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
  • Re: giving xml a colonic: re-opening (or re-opining on)an old argument
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>