[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • To: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@g...>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:11:33 +0100

On 05/09/2011 09:17, Jesper Tverskov wrote:
> How can you write "however more useful in a polyglot context" and then
> end up saying: "and is just banned in polyglot..."?
>

well by "polyglot context" I meant "situations where you want to serve 
the same file as text/html or application/xhtml+xml and get equivalent 
behaviour., But polygot spec doesn't aim for equivalent behaviour it 
aims for identical DOM, which is harder to achieve.

> Does it mean that we should use it in polyglot anyway or what?

Personally, yes I think it should be allowed, the spec already allows 
some differences from white space parsing in attribute values, and this 
isn't a lot different.

see the comment

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13604#c3

(That bug report is still open)

David
-- 
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member