Re: HTML5 and almost no namespaces
Pete Cordell scripsit: > By this argument 'name' is not ambiguous because of its context. > In fact its quite easy to define a schema that has multiple 'name' > elements with different meanings. I believe some would say that is > bad design though. But are the meanings really different? A name is a name. Here's a better example: <book> <title>Mary Barton</title> <author> <nameProfile> <purpose>legal</purpose> <givenName>Elizabeth</givenName> <familyName>Gaskell</familyName> </nameProfile> <nameProfile> <purpose>authorial</purpose> <title>Mrs.</title> <familyName>Gaskell</familyName> </nameProfile> </author> </book> Here there is genuine ambiguity between the title of a book and the title of a person. The name profile schema I mentioned in my last post uses "prefix" instead. But even if it didn't, the context would disambiguate between book/title and nameProfile/title. -- Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan (5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan to rename '.' or '..' entries; see email@example.com http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format