Re: XML Redux
Original Message From: "John Cowan" > I'd add ... and the ability to add XSD simple > type names (prepended with "^^") and language tags (prepended with "@") > to a JSON literal in either order. N3 allows this on string literals > only, but 32^^integer seems better to me than "32"^^integer. One thing I'm not clear on is, what value is there in knowing that, say, 32 is a float, if you don't know that that particular float represents, for example, the length of a box? Surely it's not sufficicient to just know the type of something. You also have to know what to do with it for it to be useful. And if you know what to do with it, you implicitly know its type so it doesn't need to be explicitly stated. What am I missing? Thanks, Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes. Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com for more info
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format