[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Reflecting on a decade of XML: Lesson Learned

  • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:15:53 +0000

Re:  Reflecting on a decade of XML:  Lesson Learned
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:45:09 -0800 (PST)

>   It would seem that attempts at a u-XML and at XML standards
> simplifications need clear statements of objectives in order to
> decide what features to include or exclude.  
>   

+1


> 
>   If, for u-XML, advantages for users is a primary objective,
> problems with u-XML include: 
> 
> ·         If an application is concerned with just text, many would
> use PDF, Microsoft Word or some other capability.  
> 
> ·         Secondly, most Web applications need to deal with data that
> exists in many forms and representations, of which text is a small
> subset.  
> 
> ·         Thirdly, most uses of the u-XML data would still require
> the complexities of other XML based technologies, in particular XHTML
> and probably XSLT.  Thus any objectives of simplicity for application
> developers are only partially achieved. 

First is clearly out of scope, unless the user wants multiple output
formats?
Not sure I see any problem with the second and uxml?
For the third stick with xml 1.0?



> 
> 
>   If, for u-XML, parsing simplicity is a primary objective, which
> seems to be mostly what it’s about, then defining a subset for
> special uses (e.g. limited devices, very large documents) might be
> useful, but it shouldn’t add complications.  However, I’m not sure
> that parsing simplicity is a major seller. 

I've not seen that as a stated objective? Have you Bill?



> 
>   If simplification of and capabilities for application
> development(which is what XML and related standards are actually used
> for) is a basic objective 

I don't think it is, though it may be a by-product? 



>   Simplification can occur basically in two ways – which are not
> incompatible. ·         Removing awkward features and complications –
> which diminishes capability

James uxml seems to do that?




-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.