Re: Status of MicroXML?
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:14:02 -0800 Jamie Clark <email@example.com> wrote: > Personal opinions here - and no relation to my namesake in Thailand. > > Pete, what more is required? Isn't it already written up? As a true > subset, it requires nothing from the XML standard itself How about a parser/something to confirm that your instance *is* uxml? Drifting into expanding the definition by aim or lack of thought could be a problem if the recipient has process tools expecting uxml? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format