[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Status of MicroXML?

  • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • To: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:08:43 +0000

Re:  Status of MicroXML?
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:14:02 -0800
Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> wrote:

> Personal opinions here - and no relation to my namesake in Thailand.
> Pete, what more is required?  Isn't it already written up?   As a true
> subset, it requires nothing from the XML standard itself

How about a parser/something to confirm that your instance *is* uxml?
Drifting into expanding the definition by aim or lack of thought could
be a problem if the recipient has process tools expecting uxml?



Dave Pawson

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.