Re: Where is XML going
On Dec 12, 2010, at 18:37, Kurt Cagle wrote: > For many of those people working in the XML space, the evolution of HTML5 in particular has become frustrating, because there has generally been very little attempt on the part of the HTML5 working group to reach out to the XML groups and find points of commonality. I don't see what this has to do with whether browsers are an open platform. Surely doing XML stuff isn't the definition of "open platform". > To my way of thinking - and certainly this is not representative of everyone on this mailing list - I think the question that perhaps needs to be asked is this: What would it take to get the HTML5 working group to consider incorporating the core XML technologies at their current levels - XSLT2, XPath 2, XSD 1.1, possibly XQuery, as well as a bridge technology such as E4X, into the HTML5 specification? It's unlikely that those technologies would be incorporated in the HTML5 spec under any circumstances. The trend is splitting stuff out of HTML5 instead of adding unrelated stuff. -- Henri Sivonen firstname.lastname@example.org http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format