RE: Towards XML 2.0
> The profiles seem more like XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces + other additional > profile specific stuff, rather than simplifications. Personally it's not > what I'm looking for. Well, the goal of this spec was not to make things simpler but to provide a firmer ground for other specs and XML applications so that they can point to one of the processor profiles and say: this is what we expect the XML processor to do and this is the information that we expect to get from it. GRDDL is a nice example of a specification that suffers from the ambiguity of what an XML processor is actually supposed to do. But I agree that looking at the current set of XML processor profiles from this thread's "making-things-simpler" perspective might be interesting/valuable. Regards, Vojtech -- Vojtech Toman Consultant Software Engineer EMC | Information Intelligence Group firstname.lastname@example.org http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format