On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:01:11 +0700 James Clark <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I wrote a post describing a fairly minimal subset of XML: > > http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/microxml.html > > James On Namespaces: "the xmlns attribute (not xmlns:x, just bare xmlns). However, as far as the MicroXML data model is concerned, it's just another attribute. It thus works in a very similar way to xml:lang: " Lovely simple namespace change. How hard would it be to explain inheritance to a newbie? Ten times easier than the current system. I don't see any utility in the ns prefix ideas though James? Just more complexity? Wouldn't it be easier to require a transform back to XML 1.0 format? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format