On 09/12/10 05:37, Michael Sokolov wrote: > I'm with you most of the way; can I slip in a couple more additions (and > a few cavils)? > > I think this tiny change would be new to this discussion (and easy to > implement and backwards compatible since it doesn't affect > well-formedness?): let's not mandate line-terminator normalization. By all means, so long as the facility for normalization in circumstances where it is required doesn't get thrown out as well. ///Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format