Re: Status of MicroXML?
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:10:13 -0700 Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Dave Pawson <email@example.com> > wrote: > > > > > Am I wrong in this, or has this thread changed to 'lets invent > > a new schema language' > > > > To be fair, that's a different thread. As I read that thread, it's > more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will > offer a worthy level of simplicity. Yes some are calling for > something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron, > Examplotron, etc." I think relax NG for uxml would be relatively easy to teach? Perhaps Schematron if you wanted to check namespace usage in uxml? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format