Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Stephen Green <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> Element referencing is not in this example. >> In my opinion, this is a CRUCIAL feature. >> > > I left out element/@ref because I've heard so many complaints that it makes > a schema harder to read. You have to use a graphical editor which can > resolve the > references and check for any broken ones, etc. Reading a larger schema with > references means switching back and forth between definitions such that you fail > to get a picture of the overall structure. Without the refs it is easy > to picture the > XML itself. (see examplotron and CAM, for example where the structure can be > 'seen' from the schema). Plus, if it is hard for a human to read it > might also be > logically harder to write a parser and / or GUI editor. I see your point : simplicity over all. Ok for me. (We will add referencing in MiniXSD :)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format