Re: Is "Hand Authoring" XML still a critical use case ?
* Michael Sokolov wrote: >I think a lot of the things we've been talking about are painful for >content producers as well as consumers: often our pain gets reflected >back up the chain anyway. I bet editors just love it when we tell them >- well we can't do anything with that document you just sent us - it >isn't even XML! Just because there's an extra blank line at the >beginning of the document This is a design flaw in the core specification; the automaton that reads the encoding declaration (or finds that there is none) for all encodings you could reasonably use with XML is very simple and very efficient, yet instead of specifying it, we have a requirement that makes common things very annoying, for instance you cannot copy <?xml version='1.0'?> <x/> into a text file and run it through your XML tools, you have to re- move the leading white space first; and a couple of non-normative suggestions in the specification how one might, or not, go about deciding what character encoding a document is using. Among all the suggestions how to change XML, this is so far the only problem I'd really like to see fixed. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format