[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Where is XML going : III Requirements

  • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
  • Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:46:20 +0000

Re:  Where is XML going : III Requirements


David Lee posed a good question in asking why and what.
Bens response was convincing to me, as part of the answer. XML on the
web[Bens definition].
The other aspect we can address is the grumbles we've heard on this
list over the last few years.  Succinctly, what aspects of the XML stack
do we need to keep and do they belong within SXML/XML 2.0?
James put the list at XML Namespaces, xml:id, xml:base and XML Infoset.
Would you add more? Drop some of these? Which parts of XML 1.0
are redundant/legacy/hard to implement|explain? What could be
culled to make a smarter spec before we build on it. 

regards DaveP


On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 13:15:12 -0800
Ben Trafford <ben@prodigal.ca> wrote:

> When we talk about XML on the Web, we're talking about going from this
> process:
> 
> Develop schema -> Write XML document -> Test XML document with native
> delivery mechanism and obscure tools -> Write transformation -> Test
> transformation -> Deliver transformation to ubiquitous environment
> 
> to
> 
> Develop schema and stylesheet -> Write XML document -> Test documents
> with well understood and supported tools -> Deliver to ubiquitous
> environment
> 
> Doesn't seem like much of a difference, to a developer's eyes. To a
> process geek like myself, I look at that and think, "Okay, so, I've
> cut out $100k off my licensing budget for the obscure tools. I've cut
> 20% off my development and delivery time. I don't need to hire for
> obscure skill sets like XSLT just to leverage the power of XML."
> 
> And then I think "$$$$$$! WOOHOO!"
> 
> -That's- why we need an XML that is compatible with existing web
> technologies. Not because it's some ivory tower dream of wonderful
> unicorns dancing in rainbows, but because it will save people a lot of
> money. 
> --->Ben

-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.