Re: Towards XML 2.0
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kay <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> >>> I think we need to focus on the greatest need. I considered responding >>> to the earlier "hysteria" comment by saying that most folks on this thread, >>> and certainly James Clark's post were not "running scared" of JSON. For my >>> part, I embrace it, and I know quite a few others do who still want XML to >>> be simplified. >>> >> I don't think it's a case of "running scared". I think it's a case of >> trying to learn from JSON how much could be achieved with something much >> simpler than we have today, but without losing the things we really value >> about XML. > > Yes. Exactly. First thing: Get the browser builders to allow cross domain loading of XML. Without that you might as just bang your head on a post. (even with that, you will just be banging your head on a padded post) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SjBdVYG9ms&feature=player_embedded -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format