Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:17:27 -0600 Peter Hunsberger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I have nothing useful to add, but I would like to state that this > thread contains some of the most clear minded thinking about XML and > the future that I have seen come out of this mailing list in a long > time. Kudos to all who have contributed, I really, really hope that > someone can move this forward! > > -- > Peter Hunsberger I can't see that soemone being a single entity this time? Too big? I think it has to be W3C. Tim Bray gave them a starting point some while ago. Are they up to it? What impact will commercial pressures have in taking this to a usable conclusion? Leave the current XML stack (the entire shark?) to meet the dochead needs and build something for the browser (and mobile) devs. I think this is Tims starter. http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html Sam Ruby collected some ideas http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2007/01/26/XML-2-0 I'm sure there are more, though few of the scope that James introduced which makes the most sense to me. -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format